Legal Opinion
State v. Ross
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 14, 2005No. SC 17335PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, C. J.
This writ of error is brought by the plaintiff in error, the office of the chief public defender of the state of Connecticut, to challenge the trial court’s denial of its motion for permission to appear as next friend of the defendant, Michael B. Ross, and as a party in interest, an intervenor or amicus curiae in postconviction judicial proceedings in the three criminal cases against the defendant. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The record reveals the following procedural history. The defendant “was charged in three cases with eight counts of capital felony in…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ford v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rees v. PeytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. RizzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Michael B. Ross, by His Next Friend, Donna Dunham v. Theresa Lantz, Commissioner of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Holton v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
- Town of New Hartford v. Connecticut Resources Recovery AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- In Re Application for Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.