Legal Opinion

Iovieno v. Commissioner of Correction

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 26, 1997No. SC 15411PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BERDON, J.

The dispositive issues in this certified appeal are: (1) whether the ten day limitation period applicable to petitions for certification to appeal from judgments in habeas corpus proceedings, set forth in General Statutes § 52-470 (b),2 implicates a habeas court’s subject matter jurisdiction so as to deprive it of authority to grant an untimely filed petition; and (2) whether the failure to file a timely appeal under § 52-470 (b), as a result of ineffective assistance of counsel, *691constitutes per se prejudice to the petitioner and therefore satisfies the prejudice requirement…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. Rodriquez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Williams v. Commission On Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. New England Savings Bank v. Bedford Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. James L. v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. Jackson v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. Jason B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API