Legal Opinion
PILCH
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1996No. ID 3298PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #3298 Interim Decision #3298 In re Stanislaw PILCH, Respondent In re Sofia PILCH, Respondent File A29 603 414 - Sneads File A29 603 413 Decided December 3, 1996 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals The respondents, husband and wife, failed to show, either individually or cumulatively, fac- tors which demonstrate extreme hardship over and above the normal economic and social dis- ruptions involved in deportation to themselves or to their three United States citizen children in order to establish suspension of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jong Ha WangSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kishin Ramchand Balani v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Rafeal Ramirez-Durazo, Rosa Isela Lopez De Ramirez, Luz Maria Ramirez-Alcaraz, Maria Sara Ramirez-Alcaraz v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Jorge Santana-Figueroa v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- CHOULIARISBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1977
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- MONREALBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2001
- ANDAZOLABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2002
- CERVANTESBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1999
- KAO AND LINBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2001
- Hector Gonzalez-Rivas v. Merrick B. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.