Legal Opinion
MONREAL
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2001No. ID 3447PublishedCited by 217 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
23 I&N Dec. 56
(BIA 2001) Interim Decision #3447 In re Francisco Javier MONREAL-Aguinaga, Respondent File A93 093 210 - Dallas Decided May 4, 2001 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) To establish “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship,” an applicant for cancellation of removal under section 240A(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b) (Supp. V 1999), must demonstrate that his or her spouse, parent, or child would suffer hardship that is substantially beyond that which would ordinarily be expected…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- ACOSTABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1985
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. PhinpathyaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by217 opinions
- Javier Martinez v. Lowell ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Rosalba Ramirez-Perez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Mendez-Castro v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Barco-Sandoval v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Jose Irineo Gonzalez-Oropeza, Guadalupe Garcia-Pineda v. U.S. Attorney General, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
212 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.