Legal Opinion
ANDAZOLA
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2002No. ID 3467PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
23 I&N Dec. 319
(BIA 2002) Interim Decision #3467 In re Martha ANDAZOLA-Rivas, Respondent File A91 431 733 - Phoenix Decided April 3, 2002 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) The respondent, an unmarried mother, did not establish eligibility for cancellation of removal under section 240A(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b) (2000), because she failed to demonstrate that her 6- and 11-year-old United States citizen children will suffer exceptional and extremely unusual hardship upon her removal to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- MONREALBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2001
- Fidelis Osuchukwu v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Pedro Efrain Ramirez-Gonzalez & Martha Ardon De Ramirez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- Mendez-Castro v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Barco-Sandoval v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Jose Irineo Gonzalez-Oropeza, Guadalupe Garcia-Pineda v. U.S. Attorney General, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- RECINASBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2002
- Mendez v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.