Legal Opinion

CERVANTES

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1999No. ID 3380PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #3380 In re Luis Felipe CERVANTES-Gonzalez - Respondent File A72 058 994 - San Francisco Decided March 11, 1999 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals *(1) The recently amended provisions of section 212(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(i) (Supp. II 1996), which require that an alien establish extreme hard- ship to his or her United States citizen or permanent resident alien spouse or parent in order to qualify for a waiver of inadmissibility, are applicable to pending cases. Matter of Soriano,

21…

2Cases cited100 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jun Min Zhang v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. Jose Simental-Galarza v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  3. Israel Reyes-Cornejo v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  4. Qi Liang Chen v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  5. Cervantes De Hernandez v. ChertoffDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API