Legal Opinion

Fleishel v. Jessup

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 19, 1956No. 103PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, C. J.

See former appeal, 242 N.C. 605, 89 S.E. 2d 462.

Appellants now present, among others, as involved on this appeal, these questions: Where defendants in their answer allege that certain property designated in the deed of trust as “machinery and equipment and other personal property” was actually affixed to and a part of the real property described therein, (1) was an issue of fact raised, and (2) did the court err in refusing to admit oral evidence as to the nature and kind of the property, so as to determine whether it was real or personal property? These questions are predicated upon…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moore v. . VallentineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  2. Springs v. . Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Horne v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. Springs v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Bryan v. . LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1858

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lee-Moore Oil Co. v. ClearySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Stephens v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API