Springs v. Atlantic Refining Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
It is alleged in the complaint that Boyd and Mendenhall sublet the premises in question to the Red “C” Oil Company, but as they parted with their entire interest in the demised premises, what really *447took place was an assignment or sale of tbe lease. Millinery Co. v. Little-Long Co., 197 N. C., 168, 148 S. E., 26. And as tbis was done witb tbe knowledge and express consent of tbe plaintiffs, it would seem tbat tbe assignees were in under tbe original lease witb tbe same rights wbicb tbeir assignors bad witb respect to removing buildings and improvements placed tbereon by Boyd and Mendenhall.…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Kerr v. KingsburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Belvin v. Raleigh Paper Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Abbott and Foster v. . CromartieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
- Tise v. . Whitaker-Harvey Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Western North Carolina Railroad v. DealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gaines v. Long Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Hamlet Hospital v. Joint Committee on StandardizationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Stephens v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Lewis v. Lewis Nursery, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Town of Fremont v. BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.