Legal Opinion

Cashman v. Brownlee

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1891No. 15,035PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCoffey, J.

This was an action by the appellees against the appellants, instituted in the Grant Circuit Court, to recover possession and to quiet title to certain described real estate.

*267The appellants filed a plea in abatement alleging that the appellees had formerly commenced an action upon the identical supposed cause of action set up in the complaint in this cause, which action was dismissed by the appellees; that the appellants recovered a judgment in said action for costs which had not been paid.

To this plea the appellees answered that they had been unable to pay said costs; that they had a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis R. R. v. HendricksIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GeiselIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Columbus, Chicago, & Indiana Central Railway Co. v. PowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Indianapolis, Cincinnati & Lafayette Railroad v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Fite v. DoeIndiana Supreme Court · 1821

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wait v. WestfallIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Consolidated Railroad v. UtzIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Cox v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. PrewittIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Fort Wayne Smelting & Refining Works v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API