Legal Opinion

Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Consolidated Railroad v. Utz

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1892No. 16,014PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the Floyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcBride, J.

-The appellee, as administrator of the estate of William P. Wood, deceased, sued to recover damages for the death of his intestate, who was killed while serving the appellant as a brakeman. This appeal is from a judgment awarding him damages. Three questions only are discussed, viz. •. The sufficiency of the complaint, the sufficiency of the evidence, and the correctness of an instruction given.

So much of the complaint as is necessary to present the question argued is as follows : “ On the 15th day of June, 1888, the said William P. Woods was engaged as such brakeman upon a moving freight…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis R. R. v. HendricksIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Atchison Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. PlunkettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  3. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. PearcyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Indianapolis, Cincinnati & Lafayette Railroad v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Paine v. Lake Erie & Louisville RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1869

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pigeon v. W. P. Fuller & Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Indiana, Illinois & Iowa Railway Co. v. SnyderIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. New Kentucky Coal Co. v. AlbaniIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Rincicotti v. John J. O'Brien Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  5. Hindman v. TimmeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API