Legal Opinion

Columbus, Chicago, & Indiana Central Railway Co. v. Powell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1872PublishedCited by 40 opinions

APPEAL from the Cass Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.

Two errors are properly assigned by the appellant, the defendant in the common pleas; first, the overruling of the demurrer of the defendant to the amended complaint; and, second, the refusal to grant a new trial on the motion of the defendant.

The complaint in question alleges that, on the 12th day of August, 1866, the Chicago and Great Eastern Railway Company, and the Toledo, Logansport, and Burlington Railway Company were both legally incorporated railway companies, and as such they were common carriers of passengers and freight for hire, and at the time aforesaid they both used the same…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kent v. LawsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Indianapolis, Cincinnati & Lafayette Railroad v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Gray v. StiverIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Peck v. VankirkIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  5. List v. KortepeterIndiana Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. McMurrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. De Hart v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BoneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. I. & G. N. R'y Co. v. GilbertTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. McCallister v. MountIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API