Legal Opinion
Chosa Ex Rel. Chosa v. Tagliente
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 22, 2005No. A04-1400PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDSON, Judge.
Appellant Diane Tagliente challenges the trial court’s issuance of an order for protection, arguing that the evidence is insufficient to support the order. Because there is insufficient evidence to support the order for protection, we reverse.
FACTS
On February 6, 2004, respondent Judith Chosa petitioned for an order for protection (OFP) from domestic abuse on behalf of her granddaughter, R.C., against R.C.’s mother, appellant Diane Tagliente. R.C. was approximately 19 months old when respondent petitioned for the OFP. Respondent alleged two incidents of domestic abuse in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gjovik v. StropeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Donovan v. DixonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Porch v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Marriage of Lossing v. LossingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
3Cited by8 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. Rickford Rehmann MungerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Sperle v. OrthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Schmidt ex rel. P.M.S. v. CoonsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Aljubailah ex rel. A. M. J. v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- In re the Matter of: Sara Marie Gasper o/b/o A. R. G., A. J. G. and A. L. G. v. Jacob Carl GasperCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.