State of Minnesota v. Rickford Rehmann Munger
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Appellant challenges his convictions of three counts of failing to register as a predatory offender, arguing that (1) his conviction for count two must be reversed because the evidence is insufficient to prove that he failed to inform his agent about his change in employment, (2) his counsel was ineffective because he failed to obtain and introduce into evidence a supervised-release violation report stating that appellant had been terminated from his employment, (3) he was acquitted of the kidnapping and false-imprisonment counts so he should not have been required to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Boutin v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bedeau v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
- Thibodeaux v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
- State of Minnesota v. Terry Izeal HeggsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2026