Legal Opinion

Schmidt ex rel. P.M.S. v. Coons

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 22, 2011No. A10-1425PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.*

Appellant grandfather challenges the district court’s decision to grant an order for protection (OFP) in favor of his grandchild, who lived in the household in which appellant abused his daughter, the child’s mother. Appellant claims that the district court abused its discretion by issuing the OFP because the child’s mother, not the child, was the alleged victim of the abuse. We affirm based on the scope of the district court’s discretion under the governing statute. We further conclude that the OFP is properly supported by the court’s findings and the findings are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beardsley v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  2. Baker v. BakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Chosa Ex Rel. Chosa v. TaglienteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  4. Bjergum v. BjergumCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schmidt ex rel. P.M.S. v. CoonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API