Redd v. Chater
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
HECKMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
The parties have consented to have the undersigned conduct all further proceedings in this matter, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(e). Plaintiff initiated this action to seek review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) denying his application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits, and the Commissioner has moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the following reasons, the Commissioner’s motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
P…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- White v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Santos v. ChaterDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
- Sousa v. ChaterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1996
- Teitelbaum v. ChaterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Connor v. ChaterDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Orbaker v. ApfelDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1999
- Porter v. ChaterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997