Legal Opinion

Redd v. Chater

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided June 11, 1997No. 1:96-cv-00136PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

HECKMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

The parties have consented to have the undersigned conduct all further proceedings in this matter, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(e). Plaintiff initiated this action to seek review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) denying his application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits, and the Commissioner has moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the following reasons, the Commissioner’s motion is granted.

BACKGROUND

P…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. White v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  2. Santos v. ChaterDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
  3. Sousa v. ChaterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1996
  4. Teitelbaum v. ChaterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Connor v. ChaterDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Orbaker v. ApfelDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1999
  2. Porter v. ChaterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API