Legal Opinion
Santos v. Chater
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 30, 1996No. Civil Action 95-30126-MAPPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REVERSE COMMISSIONER OR FOR REMAND AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO AFFIRM COMMISSIONER
(Docket Nos. 8 & 9)
PONSOR, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) has filed an objection to Magistrate Judge Kenneth P. Nei-man’s Report and Recommendation that the Commissioner’s motion to affirm the denial of Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) disability benefits to plaintiff Jorge Santos be denied. After de novo review, this court will adopt the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation.
II. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Maria S. Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Sullivan v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Alfred PERKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Edwin R. Cordova Torres v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Grigsby v. MassanariCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Aikens v. ShalalaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
- James O'Kane v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.