Legal Opinion
Teitelbaum v. Chater
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 17, 1996No. Civil Action 95-7346PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOHN, District Judge.
In this appeal from the final decision of the Social Security Administration denying plaintiffs request for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, the court is called upon to interpret the meaning of new legislation; the Senior Citizen’s Right to Work Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-121,110 Stat. 847-57 (1996) (“Right to Work Act”), which eliminates the right to receive disability benefits based on alcoholism and drug addiction. The question in this case is the extent to which Congress intended the Act to apply to actions…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ronald MAGGARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Edwin R. Cordova Torres v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- James O'Kane v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- David G. ADAMS, Appellee, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Miller v. CallahanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.