Legal Opinion

Evans v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1935No. 25443. En BancPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tolman, J. —

Six several suits instituted to recover damages for the alleged wrongful diversion of underground waters were, by stipulation; consolidated and tried to the court, sitting without a jury, resulting in findings favorable to the plaintiffs and a judgment against the city aggregating eleven thousand dollars, which was segregated so that the plaintiff or plaintiffs in each of the original actions were each awarded a definite and specific amount. The city has appealed from that judgment.

The assignments of error question almost every fact now material, as well as the law which was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. City of San Bernardino v. City of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Miller v. Bay Cities Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Hudson v. DaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Meeker v. City of East OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  5. Patrick v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bristor v. CheathamArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Jarvis v. State Land DepartmentArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Ball v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  4. Muskatell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Finley v. Teeter Stone, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API