Finley v. Teeter Stone, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.
This appeal involves a claim for damages alleged to have resulted to at least 35 acres (and possibly 57 acres) of improved farmland in Carroll County. The land in question is owned and occupied by the appellants, George M. Finley and Elizabeth Englar Finley, his wife, (Finleys), who claim that the quarrying operations of the appellee, Teeter Stone, Inc. (Teeter) on adjacent land has resulted in the Finleys’ land being dewatered, thereby causing damage by reason of substantial subsidence. The Circuit Court for Carroll County (Macgill, C. J.), at the end of the case presented by the plaintiffs,…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- City of Pasadena v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. ReaneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
- Chatfield v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1855
- Bristor v. CheathamArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- City of San Bernardino v. City of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bausch & Lomb Inc. v. Utica Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Village of Tequesta v. Jupiter Inlet Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Friendswood Development Co. v. Smith-Southwest Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
- Kirby v. HookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Jarvis v. State Land DepartmentArizona Supreme Court · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.