Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 6, 1984No. 84 Civ. 4094 (RWS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Donald Robinson, Richard Hill, Charles Adams, James Wolfanger, Karl Rahn, and Ronald Fregara, former employees of defendant Pan American World Airways, Inc. (“Pan Am”) brought this action pursuant to the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. (the “R.L.A.”) asserting that they were dismissed because of their union organizing efforts in violation of § 2, Fourth of the R.L.A. Pan Am has now moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim and for untimeliness. For the reasons stated below, the motion is…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Switchmen's Union v. National Mediation BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Simion Stepanischen v. Merchants Despatch Transportation CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees v. Association for the Benefit of Non-Contract EmployeesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Donald Robinson, Richard Hill, Charles M. Adams, James Wolfanger, Karl Rahn and Ronald Fregara v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Robinson v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Robinson v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986