Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 20, 1985No. 84 Civ. 4094 (RWS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Donald Robinson, Richard Hill, Charles Adams, James Wolfanger, Karl Rahn, and Ronald Fregara, former employees of defendant Pan American World Airways, Inc. (“Pan Am”) brought this action pursuant to the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. (the “R.L.A.”) asserting that they were dismissed because of their union organizing efforts in violation of § 2, Fourth of the R.L.A. Pan Am subsequently moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim and for untimeliness. In an opinion dated November 6, 1984 and reported…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Burnett v. GrattanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anthony Ranieri v. United Transportation Union, an Unincorporated Association, and Lawrence G. LewmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Gordon v. WinpisingerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- Bernard v. Delivery DriversDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Donald Robinson, Richard Hill, Charles M. Adams, James Wolfanger, Karl Rahn and Ronald Fregara v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Robinson v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986