Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 16, 1986No. 84 Civ. 4094 (RWS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Pan American World Airways, Inc. (“Pan Am”) has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R. Civ.P. dismissing the complaint of plaintiffs Donald Robinson, Charles Adams, James Wolfanger, Karl Rahn and Ronald Fregara 1 (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) on the grounds that their complaint is barred by the statute of limitations on their Railway Labor Act (“RLA”) claim, 42 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. Plaintiffs contend that Pan Am should be equitably estopped from raising the limitations bar because of Pan Am’s continuous delays in concluding the inter-rial…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- DBL Liquidating Trust v. Clarkson Construction Co. (In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Robinson v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986