Legal Opinion

Hyduke's Valley Motors v. Lobel Financial Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 2010No. G042816PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

O’LEARY, Acting P. J.

Hyduke’s Valley Motors (Hyduke’s) appeals from the postjudgment order denying its motion for attorney fees against Lobel Financial Corporation (Lobel) and County Finance Services (CFS). Car wholesaler Hyduke’s prevailed in its action to recover from finance companies CFS and Lobel the purchase price of vehicles it sold to a used car dealer, which the dealer in turn sold to consumers, with financing provided by CFS and Lobel. Hyduke’s contends attorney fees were authorized by the conditional sales contracts between the used car dealer and the consumers that were…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Murillo v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Stout v. TurneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Abdallah v. United Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Douglas E. Barnhart, Inc. v. CMC Fabricators, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Eden Township Healthcare District v. Eden Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Orozco v. WPV San Jose, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. Carmel Financing, LLC v. SchoenmannDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
  5. Chhatrala Investments, LLC v. Elajou Investment Group, L.P. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API