Legal Opinion

Knutson v. Moe Bros.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1913No. 10870PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered May 27, 1912, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff for $5,000, for personal injuries sustained' through the fall of a log from a car.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

The plaintiff in this action seeks to be recompensed for a personal injury sustained while employed by the defendant, in consequence of its alleged negligence. There was a verdict and judgment in his favor for $5,000, which the defendant seeks to reverse or modify by this appeal.

The errors suggested are, (1) .that the respondent was guilty of contributory negligence; (2) that the testimony of Bert Nelson should not have been admitted; (8) that an objection interposed to a hypothetical question should have been sustained; and (4) that the verdict was excessive. These questions will be…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. HopeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  2. Turner v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Barber's Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  4. People v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. German Ins. Co. of Freeport v. FrederickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. Union Pacific R. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Hayhurst v. Boyd HospitalIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Hamilton v. KelseyOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Spinelli v. Economy Stations, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Roy v. Oregon Short Line R. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API