Legal Opinion

People v. Nelson

California Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1890No. 20628PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and from an order denying a new iriaL The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C. C.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of robbery, and he appeals from the judgment, and an order denying him a new trial. Numerous errors in the admission, of evidence and in the refusal to give certain instructions, as asked by defendant, are assigned; and in order to make clear the points presented, a brief statement of the facts should be made. The offense charged was committed by stopping one Thomas Davis on the highway, and taking from him his watch and chain and a small amount of money. Davis was the foreman of a ranch situated on the north side of the American River,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. RolfeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. People v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  3. People v. ManningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. People v. Chee KeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. GlazeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. State v. HowardMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. In Re the Estate of De LaveagaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. People v. BerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API