Farnham v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL (Miriam A.), J.
—Although the policy of the law supposedly frowns upon all contracts that exempt a party from responsibility for his own “fraud, or willful injury to the person or property of another, or violation of law, whether willful or negligent” (Civ. Code, § 1668), 1 that policy is not enforced in every context, and contractual releases of future liability for ordinary negligence, as well as contractual indemnity provisions, insurance contracts, and other limitations on liability are generally enforceable. Conversely, however, contractual releases of future liability for…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Charles DALE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHICAGO TRIBUNE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Merlo v. Standard Life & Accident InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- City of Santa Barbara v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Lagatree v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Ting v. AT & TDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
- Frittelli, Inc. v. 350 North Canon Drive, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Health Net of California, Inc. v. Department of Health ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.