Legal Opinion

Rudolph v. Wannamaker

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

— This appeal is from a judgment in favor of respondent and against appellants rendered in an action for the recovery of damages for personal injuries sustained by the respondent as a result of a collision between an automobile driven by appellant Mrs. Wannamaker and a motorcycle on which respondent was riding.

Appellants assign and rely upon five assignments of error. Assignments of error Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 are predicated upon the action of the trial court in refusing to give to the jury certain instructions requested by appellants. Assignment No. 5 is directed against the giving by the court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miami Quarry Co. v. Seaborg Packing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Larrow v. MartellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
  3. Bennington v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Carpenter v. McKissickIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Stinson v. RourkeIdaho Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nelson v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API