Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Johnson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1925PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

— Action by Thomas Nelson, respondent, for personal injuries and damage' to his automobile claim'ed to have been caused by Epliriam Johnson, appellant, and Joseph Johnson, by a collision between the automobiles belonging to the respective parties.

The appeal is from the judgment on a verdict for $1,500 against Ephriam Johnson and* an order denying a new trial.

Appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to show that he or anyone collided with respondent’s car or that respondent knew who collided with his car or that he received any injury. The most that can be said in favor of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Maloney v. Winston Bros.Idaho Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Jones v. City of CaldwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Ewing v. Van AlstineUtah Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Ellis v. Ashton & St. Anthony Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Maw v. Coast Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Owen v. Taylor Ex Rel. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Gardner v. HobbsIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Gould v. HillIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Reinhold v. SpencerIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Summerfield v. PringleIdaho Supreme Court · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API