Larrow v. Martell
Supreme Court of Vermont
Action ok Tort to recover for personal injuries and property damage. Trial by jury at the September Term, 1917, Windham County, Stanton, J., presiding. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant Martell excepted. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtWatson, C. J.
This is an action of tort to recover for injuries to person and damages to property. During the course of the trial the case was discontinued as to defendant Cobb, and we hereinafter use the word defendant as referring to Martell only. The verdict was for the plaintiff. The ease is here on defendant’s exceptions.
The act of defendant of which complaint is made, was done within the limits of the incorporated village of Brattleboro, and at the intersection of Frost, Flat, and Elm streets, which intersection makes four corners, though not all right-angled. Elm street runs northerly and southerly,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sartwell v. SowlesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1900
- Judd v. BallardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1894
- Ullman v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Sowles v. MooreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1893
- Vincent v. StinehourSupreme Court of Vermont · 1835
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wellman v. MeadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
- Bonacci v. CerraNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
- Mason v. SaultSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
- Mattison v. SmalleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
- David Baker and Lee J. Baker v. The American Insurance Company of Newark, New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.