Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. McKissick

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEEUE, District Judge.

— This ease arises out of the fact that a pedestrian on a paved country highway, known as *731the Lewiston Orchards Highway, was struck by a car driven by the defendant. The administrator of deceased’s estate brings this action, for the benefit of seven adult heirs, for money expended for medical attendance and for damages for the loss of the society of decedent. A verdict was rendered by the jury in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiff appeals.

The first specification of error is that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict. There is very little controversy…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Graham v. MilsapIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Nelson v. LottUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Rudolph v. WannamakerIdaho Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API