Paramount Paper Products Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNewton, J.
This is an action on a blanket crime policy issued by defendant to plaintiff. As a part of the insuring agreement, the policy provides coverage as follows: “EMPLOYEE DISHONESTY COVERAGE. 1. Loss of Money, Securities and other property which the Insured shall sustain through any fraudulent or dishonest act or acts committed by any of the Employees, acting alone or in collusion with others.” It also contains the following exclusion clause referred to as Section 2. “This Policy does not apply: * * * (b) to loss, or to that part of any loss, as the case may be, the proof of which, either as *830to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tri-Motors Sales, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- The Gillette Company v. The Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
- Fort Smith Tobacco & Candy Co. v. American Guarantee & Liability InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1962
- Hoboken Camera Ctr., Inc. v. HARTFORD ACC. & IND.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Locke Distributing Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dunlop Tire and Rubber Corporation v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- HCA, Inc. v. American Protection Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
- Jones v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- Security Insurance Company of Hartford v. Harry S. And Betty L. Wilson, Dba Sands RestaurantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Danal Jewelry Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.