Legal Opinion
Hoboken Camera Ctr., Inc. v. HARTFORD ACC. & IND.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 23, 1967PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
93 N.J. Super. 484 (1967)
226 A.2d 439
HOBOKEN CAMERA CENTER, INC., PHOTOPOOL, INC., CONSOLIDATED DISTRIBUTING CORP., SHOPPERS WORLD CAMERA CENTER, INC., MULTIPOOL, INC., AND KAYE CAMERA EXCHANGE, INC., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 31, 1966.
Decided January 23, 1967.
Before Judges CONFORD, FOLEY and LEONARD.
Mr. Edward K. Zuckerman argued the cause for appellants.
Mr. Murray Greiman argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Lifland & Greiman, attorneys).
The opinion of the court…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kievit v. Loyal Protective Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Danek v. HommerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Danek v. HommerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Linden Motor Freight Co., Inc. v. Travelers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Garden State Plaza Corp. v. SS Kresge Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Meyer Jewelry Co. v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Rotwein v. General Accident Group & Cas.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Wolfe v. State Farm Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Paramount Paper Products Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1968
- Williams v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.