Legal Opinion

Hall v. . Commissioners of Duplin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 28, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBbogdeN, J.

This cause was considered by the Court upon a former appeal and is reported in 194 N. 0., 768. The Court remanded the case to the Superior Court of Duplin County “for further proceedings” for the reason that the essential facts necessary to support the validity of the bonds did not appear either in the judgment or upon the record presented to the Court. Thereafter, on 10 January, 1928, an affidavit was filed by the members of the board of education and the county superintendent to the effect that on 9 May, 1927, the board of education requested the board of commissioners of Duplin County to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frazier v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Lovelace v. . PrattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Board of Education v. . WalterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Forbes v. City of DurantMississippi Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Hemric v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API