Legal Opinion

Lovelace v. . Pratt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 7, 1924PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoke, J.

The Consolidated Public School Law (chapter 136, Laws-1923, article 23) provides, in effect, that when the outstanding indebtedness created prior to the year 1923 for the necessary expenses of conducting a six-months school in the respective counties, shall exceed the sum of $10,000, the boards of county commissioners are authorized, empowered and directed to fund the same by issuing the serial notes of the county, or serial bonds thereof, for the amount of such indebtedness, and to levy annually a special ad valorem tax on all the tangible property of the county sufficient to pay said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. Commissioners.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Lacy v. Fidelity Bank of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Board of Education v. Board of Commissioners of Johnston CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bridges Ex Rel. City of Charlotte v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Henderson v. . WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Mebane Graded School District v. County of AlamanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Frazier v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Henderson v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API