Legal Opinion

Barker v. Dayton Walther Corp.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 1989No. 11177PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFain, J.

The issue before us is whether an employee who has been disabled as a result of a work-related injury for more than six months may be discharged by his employer as a result of the employer’s policy of discharging any employee who is medically disabled from working for more than six months. Plaintiffs-appellants, each of whom was discharged from his employment pursuant to such a policy, contend that their discharges violated the prohibition against retaliatory discharges contained in R.C. 4123.90 or, in the alternative, that their discharges were against public policy.

We conclude that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Judson Steel Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Clifford v. Cactus Drilling Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Clifford v. Cactus Drilling Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. Riverdale Local School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. White v. Mount Carmel Medical CenterOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Hess v. Clarcor, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Metheney v. Sajar Plastics, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Lillback v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API