Legal Opinion

Van Pelt v. Carte

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 19, 1962No. Civ. 6864PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendant in a personal injury action.

Pacts

On November 18, 1958, between 1:15 and 1:30 p. m. on a dry, clear day, plaintiff was riding as a guest passenger in the right hand front seat of the Hudson automobile owned and driven by her father, Walter Whittaker, in a northerly direction on Riverside Avenue (hereinafter called Avenue) at its intersection with U.S. Highway 99 (hereinafter called Highway) a few miles west of San Bernardino. At said intersection the travelled portion of Avenue was about 36 feet wide, with one lane for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Daniels v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Robinson v. CableCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Pobor v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Martindale v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Raliway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Otterbeck v. LambNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Hayslip v. GeorgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Casey v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Estate of RowleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Wigodsky v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API