Legal Opinion

Wigodsky v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 1969No. Civ. 32650PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in an action for personal injuries.

'Plaintiff brought the action for injuries received when a train of defendant collided with a stalled tanker truck on which plaintiff was working. Some of the facts as developed by. the testimony are as follows: on the morning of December 15, 1964, plaintiff and Cullis Rogers were employees of the Stevlin Company, a landscaping contractor engaged in spraying, of in preparing to spray a weed control solution along one of the roads on the Vandenberg Air Force Base. The defendant operated trains on its tracks which at the point…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Marchetti v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Robinson v. CableCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Pobor v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Miller v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Bardin v. CaseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fuller v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Fashion 21 v. Coalition for Humane Immigrant RightsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Kinda v. CarpenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Johnson v. PrasadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Mahoney v. CorralejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API