Michigan v. Lucas
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor
Because Nolan Lucas failed to give statutorily required notice of his intention to present evidence of an alleged rape victim’s past sexual conduct, a Michigan trial court refused to let him present the evidence at trial. The Michigan Court of Appeals reversed, adopting a per se rule that preclusion of evidence of a rape victim’s prior sexual relationship with a criminal defendant violates the Sixth Amendment. We consider the propriety of this per se rule.
I — I
Like most States, Michigan has a rape-shield statute designed to protect victims of rape from being exposed at trial to harassing or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by447 opinions
- United States v. SchefferSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Richard Junior FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Montana v. EgelhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Nevada v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- People v. StanawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
442 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.