Legal Opinion

Rutland Cable T v. Inc. v. City of Rutland

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 15, 1960No. 1896PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

By petition for a writ of mandamus, the Rutland Cable T. V., Inc. seeks to compel the city of Rutland, its city council and Reginald D. Knipes, a stenographic reporter engaged by the city, to comply with the provisions of No. 192 of the Acts of 1959. This enactment, now 4 V.S.A. §§737, 741, 742, relates to stenographic reporting of hearings before quasi-judicial tribunals and establishes the fees for furnishing the transcript and copies. It provides:

Section 1. Hearings before commissions and quasi-judicial tribunals. In hearings before a commission, department or other quasi-judicial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In re Fulham's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  2. Sorrell v. WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
  3. In re Barre Water Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1889
  4. First Nat'l B'k v. Comr. of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
  5. Vermont Electric Power Co., Inc. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kalakowski v. John A. Russell Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1979
  2. In Re PreseaultSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972
  3. Audette v. GreerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
  4. Quinn v. PateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
  5. American Oil Company v. State Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API