Legal Opinion

Quinn v. Pate

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 4, 1964No. 1037PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This is an appeal from a determination of the Commissioner of Industrial Relations upon an agreed statement of facts. The claimant, Francis A. Quinn, the appellant here, was employed at a garage and filling station operated by the defendant, James W. Page, as a mechanic and attendant at a weekly wage of $22.00 per week. He was also employed as a truck driver by Rollers by Baker, Inc., at a weekly wage of $69.00. He was injured in an accident which arose out of and in the course of his employment at the Pate Garage and Filling Station.

On May 29, 1961, the appellant executed an agreement for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morrisseau v. LegacSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
  2. State v. MahoneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1961
  3. Wilkins v. Blanchard-McDonald Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1947
  4. Goodwin v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1962
  5. Rutland Cable T v. Inc. v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Barnhardt v. Yellow Cab CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Vincent v. Vermont State Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  3. King v. SnideSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  4. Lydy v. Trustaff, Inc./Wausau Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  5. Herbert v. LaymanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1966

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API