Legal Opinion
In re Fulham's Estate
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided January 4, 1923PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.
The probate court for the district of Windsor disallowed the claim of the State for a transfer tax on certain property formerly owned by Yolney S. Fulham, late of Ludlow. The commissioner of taxes, in behalf of the State, appealed to the county court, wherein a trial by court was had on an agreed statement of facts, and judgment was rendered for the defendant estate. The State alleges error. Briefly stated, the' essential facts are as follows: At different times, Fulham, being the owner of certain railroad stocks, indorsed the seven certificates representing the same and delivered them to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Keeney v. Comptroller of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of KeeneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- In Re the Estate of BrandrethNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Lines's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Osgood v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1905
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- State Board of Equalization v. ColeMontana Supreme Court · 1948
- Blodgett v. Guaranty Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Sorrell v. WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
- Clifford v. West Hartford Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1931
- Brammall v. LaroseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.