Legal Opinion

Peebles v. . Braswell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1890PublishedCited by 21 opinions

This was a civil action, tried at the March Term, 1890, of Pitt Superior Court, by Boykin, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Clabk, J.:

There is no case on appeal settled by the Judge, nor any “case agreed” signed by counsel. There is a statement of case on appeal, signed only by appellant’s counsel, but nothing to show that it was served within the time, or, indeed, ever at all, upon appellee or his counsel. This, it has been held, cannot be considered. Manufacturing Co. v. Simmons, 97 N. C., 89.

The appellant now asks for a certiorari, but there is no affidavit to negative laches on the part of the appellant, and, so far as the application is to be construed as being for a cer-tiorari to the Judge to settle the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Randleman Manufacturing Co. v. SimmonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  2. Robeson v. . HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Simmons v. . AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Hatch v. Alamance Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Hatch v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Burrell v. . HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API