Legal Opinion

Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Stilson

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 2, 1940PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOYCE, District Judge.

On September 29, 1938, the defendant C. W. Stilson, a resident of Duluth, Minnesota, was the owner of a Buick automobile. He had theretofore and on or about the 22nd day of April, 1938, procured from the plaintiff company a policy of insurance containing among others the following provision as to those who were insured thereunder: “Definition of Insured. The unqualified word ‘insured’- wherever used in Coverages A and B and in other parts of this policy, when applicable to these coverages, includes not only the named insured but also any person while using the automobile…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
  3. Stovall v. New York Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Dickinson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  5. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. BeverfordenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Vezolles v. Home Indemnity Co., New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
  2. Eicher v. Universal UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. Wallin v. KnudtsonWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Yorkshire Indemnity Co. of New York v. CollierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
  5. Auto Owners (Mutual) Insurance v. StanleyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API