Legal Opinion

Auto Owners (Mutual) Insurance v. Stanley

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided January 6, 1967No. Civ. No. 3491PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

GRANT, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff insurance company (Auto Owners) brought this action seeking a determination of its rights under a policy of insurance issued to the D. L. Miller Auto Sales, a South Bend, Indiana automobile dealer. The case was tried to this Court sitting without a jury. After carefully considering all of the evidence and the applicable law, we are of the opinion that Auto Owners is bound by its policy to provide coverage to the defendant Richard A. Stanley.

On August 12, 1962 Auto Owners issued to the D. L. Miller Auto Sales a standard “Garage Liability Policy”…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Storm v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1957
  2. Jurd v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Automobile Underwriters, Inc. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Pavelski v. RoginskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Horace A. Arnold, as Administrator of the Estate of Robert Eugene Arnold v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Photovest Corporation, an Indiana Corporation, and Cross-Appellant v. Fotomat Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  2. Grissom v. MoranIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Smith v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Mayfrey Mays, Administratrix of the Estate of Daniel Mays, Deceased v. Dealers Transit, Inc., Harold L. Flannery, Donald F. Scalise, and George MaysCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PriceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API