Legal Opinion

Parker v. New England Oil Corporation

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided June 8, 1926No. 1747PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORTON, District Judge.

The affidavit of prejudice states facts the legal effect of which may be summarized as follows:

A proceeding having been instituted, seeking to charge A., B., and C.. with fraud and imposition on the court, the judge who heard the cause became convinced by the evidence that the defendants were guilty of the fraud and imposition charged against them, and that D. (not a party to the proceedings) was actively associated with them in their wrongdoing. And the jndge so found in formal opinions, in which he severely criticized D.’s conduct. When the proceeding had been heard…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Ex Parte American Steel Barrel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Henry v. SpeerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1913
  4. Ex parte N. K. Fairbank Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1912
  5. Saunders v. Piggly Wiggly CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Morse v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
  2. United States v. Nathan ShavinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
  3. Ferrari v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  4. Callwood v. CallwoodDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1954
  5. Third Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. WhiteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API