Legal Opinion
Saunders v. Piggly Wiggly Corporation
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided September 17, 1924No. 830, 831PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, District Judge.
In these consolidated causes a motion was filed on the 3d day of September, 1924, by plaintiff in No. 830, who is one of the defendants in No. 831, with a view of having the regular judge of this court recuse himself in order that another judge may be designated to try the questions involved in the litigation. The authority for filing such motion is to be found in section 21 of the Judicial Code, the same being the Act of March 3, 1911, c. 231, § 21, 36 Statutes at Large, 1090 (Compiled Statutes, § 988. This section is as follows:
“Whenever a party to any action or…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Ex Parte American Steel Barrel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Ex Parte SecombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- Louisville Trust Co. v. City of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Henry v. SpeerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1913
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In the Matter of Union Leader CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
- Baskin v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- United States v. GilboyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- National Broadcasting Company, Inc. v. Jackie PresserCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.