Ex Parte American Steel Barrel Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
PETITION EOS, WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND RULE. The facts, which involve the construction of § 21 of the Judicial Code of 1911 and-the jurisdiction of this court to issue writs of mandamus, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lurton
This is a proceeding for a rule on the Hon. Thos. I. Chatlield, District Judge of the United States for the Eastern District of New York, the Hon. Julius Mayer, District Judge for .the Southern District of New York, and the Hon. E; Henry Lacombe, Senior Circuit Judge for the Second Judicial Circuit of the United States, to show cause why a writ of mandamus shall not be issued commanding the Hon. Thos. I. Chatfield to resume jurisdiction and proceed to hear and determine all matters which may arise or have arisen in a certain proceeding pending in the said District Court for the Eastern…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Glasgow v. MoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Ex Parte NewmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- In Re MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Bayard v. United States Ex Rel. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Ex Parte BurtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by209 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
204 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.