Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 18, 1991No. 3-90-212-CRPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTom G. Davis, Justice

(Retired).

The State appeals the trial court's order granting appellee’s motion to suppress evidence of the results of his blood-alcohol test. In a single point of error, the State asserts the trial court abused its discretion in suppressing the test results. We reject the State’s point of error and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

In a similar case, State v. Comeaux, 786 S.W.2d 480 (Tex.App.1990), aff’d (Tex.Cr. App.1991), this Court noted that the decision to suppress the results of a blood test is addressed to the trial court's discretion. 786 S.W.2d at 481. The standard for reviewing…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Calloway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Aliff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Juarez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. Read, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
  2. Davy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
  3. Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Nottingham v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
  5. State v. WilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API