Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 3, 1992No. 1202-91PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

OVERSTREET, Judge.

Appellee was charged with driving while intoxicated. The State appealed the trial court’s order granting appellee’s motion to suppress evidence. The Third Court of Appeals affirmed the ruling of the trial court. State v. Williams, 814 S.W.2d 256 (Tex. App.-Austin, 1991). We granted the State’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether appellee voluntarily consented to have his blood drawn after being informed he was under arrest.

I. PERTINENT FACTS

Appellee was involved in a one car accident in which he ran off…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. Read, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
  2. Davy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
  3. Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Atkins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  5. Adolphus Ewerokeh v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1992

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API