Legal Opinion
People v. Boysen
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 3, 2007No. D046763PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENKE, J.
In 1980 Elsie Boysen (Elsie) and her husband Robert Boysen (Robert) were murdered. In May 2004 their son, defendant David Andrew Boysen (David), was charged with the crimes. David sought and the trial court granted dismissal based on preaccusation delay. The People appeal, arguing the trial court applied an incorrect legal standard. They farther contend that in any event there was insufficient evidence to support the trial court’s decision, and the court abused its discretion in not reserving a decision on the motion until after trial.
We affirm. We conclude the trial court…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Raven v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. MirendaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. BoothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Arriaga v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2025
- Dickerson v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- P. v. Shammam CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.